A New Look at Letterlocking: Secrets Sealed in Paper

Courtesy Sound & Vision The Hague/MIT Press

Three square diamond formats from the Brienne Collection of undelivered letters found in a postmaster’s trunk dating between 1689 and 1706.

For centuries, evidence of a lost technology was tucked away in archives and libraries around the world. Creases, slits, traces of sealing wax, and missing corners on fragile letters were often seen as signs of damage, when in truth they were clues to a sophisticated and nearly forgotten security practice.

Before the invention of the gummed envelope in 1830, letter writers routinely employed the techniques of letterlocking—manipulating their letter into its own envelope. The use of tucks, cuts, folds, adhesive wafers, and/or sealing wax created a sealed packet that showed signs of tampering if opened. Now, conservator Jana Dambrogio and literary historian Daniel Starza Smith are bringing this overlooked technology into full view, not just as a historical curiosity, but as a serious object of interdisciplinary study. Their book Letterlocking: The Hidden History of the Letter was published this spring by MIT Press.

“Our first goal was to let people know about this amazing historical technology, which lay at the heart of letter writing for centuries,” said Smith, a senior lecturer in early modern English literature at King’s College London. “It’s so important to the history of human communication and deserves to be better known.”

The field began taking shape in the early 2000s, when Dambrogio, now a conservator for Massachusetts Institute of Technology Libraries, was a conservation fellow at the Vatican Apostolic Archives. Working with the Fondo Veneto, Sezione II—a vast collection of monastic documents dating from 900 to 1700 CE—she was confronted with letters that bore curious patterns: holes, missing flaps, strange slits, and creases that didn’t make sense as simple signs of aging. Were these indications of damage, she wondered, or something else?

Following the folds, she began reverse-engineering the documents into their original three-dimensional forms. What emerged wasn’t deterioration, but intention: physical evidence of a sophisticated letter-securing system. She started making models to track her observations, and as she continued her conservation work in Italy and the United States, she saw similar evidence reappearing across collections. The idea of “letterlocking” crystallized, and the need for a more systematic study became clear.

Dambrogio eventually partnered with Smith, whose background in early modern English literature offered a new lens on the materials. Together in 2012, they launched the Unlocking History Research Group, a wide-ranging interdisciplinary team that includes not just conservators and historians, but also computer scientists, engineers, imaging experts, and even experts in dentistry (who assisted in scans of some of the material). A series of grants and work with students in both the US and the UK allowed for the development of an associated website (letterlocking.org), an in-depth dictionary, and a series of instructional videos that demonstrate various letterlocking techniques.

A demonstration of the octagon format of letterlocking.
1/3
Courtesy MIT Libraries/MIT Press

A demonstration of the octagon format of letterlocking.

A simulacrum of a letterpacket from Mahmud ibn Muhammad
2/3
Courtesy MIT Libraries/MIT Press

A simulacrum of a letterpacket from Mahmud ibn Muhammad, Bey of Tunis (1817), angled so that its address can be read. 

A model of a partially opened locked letter
3/3
Courtesy MIT Libraries/MIT Press

A model of a partially opened locked letter showing how various layers, materials, manipulations, and locking mechanisms interact to transform a sheet of paper into a secure letterpacket. 

The new letterlocking book is both a foundational text and a hands-on guide, featuring over 300 diagrams and a dictionary of sixty technical terms. The authors believe deeply in “learning by doing” and invite readers to create their own models. “The main reason you should give this a go is because it’s fun,” said Smith. “There’s something utterly absorbing and fascinating about figuring out these techniques—then delighting a friend with an unexpected delivery in the mail.”

Of course, there’s more at stake. Dambrogio said that one of their goals with the book was to “illustrate how, throughout history, people have actively sought to connect through letters while ingeniously protecting their messages from prying eyes during transit.” 

Studying these techniques can also offer new scholarly opportunities. As Smith put it, “In an increasingly digital world, we have an opportunity through letterlocking to think about the ways that material artifacts have carried meaning.” After all, letterlocking wasn’t a single tradition but a constellation of techniques adapted by kings, spies, lovers, and bureaucrats. It was used by Elizabeth I’s courtiers, by Japanese samurai, and by poets like John Donne, whose sealed packets, the pair realized early on, were not only secure but characteristically playful. Indeed, the choice of a letterlocking technique could reflect not just security concerns, but also aesthetics, etiquette, or tradition.

One striking example comes from a 1798 letter sent between two Freemasons and addressed to Lieutenant George August Dossit D’Alban. It was found in the Prize Papers, a collection held in the UK’s national archives that includes thousands of letters and objects intercepted by British privateers and naval vessels. The paper of the letter is folded into a long strip, then folded again and twisted into something almost like a bow on a present. “We call this the nonagon because it has nine sides, but it also has another really interesting feature,” Smith said. “At the center of this packet is a triangle, a shape important to Masons because of their special interest in the mathematical theories of Pythagoras.”

The book, and the letterlocking field as a whole, also aims to be a boon for research and conservation. The authors have identified sixty-four letterlocking categories, based on the folds, tucks, and other manipulations that transform the letter into its own “letterpacket.”

“These manipulations and features … often mimic damage,” Dambrogio explained. “It is crucial in the study of letterlocking to distinguish between actual damage, like worn holes, and manipulations. Confusing the two can lead to the unintentional concealment of vital information during repairs, hindering letterlocking scholars in accurately identifying and categorizing the letters.”

In an era when many people have moved their private conversations to encrypted apps such as Signal, the questions raised by letterlocking feel newly resonant. “We’re conscious that we’re releasing a book about the history of letters at a time when many people no longer send letters,” Smith said. “But the privacy of our communication—or, as we might say today, the security of our private data—remains a vitally important topic.”